The Effect Of Third Party Candidates In Presidental Elections Essay exa

The Effect of Third Party Candidates in Presidental ElectionsAlthough citizens of the joined States have the opportunity to vote formany different offices at the national, state, and topical anaesthetic levels, the election ofthe president of the United States every four years is the central point of theAmeri female genitalia governmental dish out. The American political schema has hold a two-party system since its inception. Political scientists argue that a bipartisansystem is the most stable and efficient means of conducening a democratic nation asa mono-party system leads toward tyranny, and a multi-party system creates over-diversification and gridlock (Mazmanian 6). The Constitution of the UnitedStates does not in any carriage limit the structure of the political system to twoparties. In fact, thither has been no presidential election where in that location were onlytwo panoramas however, third-party outlooks argon rarely represented in amajority of the states, and those that were on the voting in a majority ofstates have never been successful. However, on a few occasions, third partycandidates have been able to make a significant impact on the presidentialelection process such(prenominal) as George Wallace in 1968 and H. Ross Perot in 1992.Through nineteenth century there was little deviation from the traditionaltwo-party system. Until then, political candidates were utterly dependant uponthe political infrastructure of an established party for their campaigns. Untilthe development of mass media technologies, including receiving set and video,political candidates had no direct means of communicating with the public andwere indeed dependant on the communications systems of the major parties. Thus,third party movements lacked the capabilities to run an exertionive campaignagainst the major parties.However, mass media has changed the scope of the election process andbrought about the demise of the major political parties (Robinson 147).Can didates who run a television dominated campaign have hurt their parties in a consequence of ways. The media specialists who manage such campaigns tend to beloyal to a candidate rather than to the candidates party as a result, thecampaign supports a exclusive candidate and not the entire ticket of the party. Inaddition, the heavy confidence on television allows a candidate to reach votersdirectly, thereby change the traditional function of the party as aninfo... ...eed, Ross Perot and George Wallace had aprofound effect on the outcome of the elections they participated in, but Perothad a more lasting effect. Ross Perot be to the world that it is quiteplausible for a completely independent candidate to "walk into center stage andsteal the show" (Robinson 141). With the decline of the political parties andtheir role in the campaign process, the possibilities for more successfulindependent candidates can only increase. Eventually an independent will gofarther than swaying t he outcome. iodine day an independent will win.Works CitedBrown, Gene. H. Ross Perot Texas Billionaire. Vero Beach Rourke Enterprises,Inc, 1993.Goldman, Peter and tomcat Mathews. "The Manhattan Project". Newsweek (SpecialElection Issue) November/December, 1992. pp.40-57Jackson, David. "3rd party chances gauged" Dallas Morning News. November 5, 1992.Mazmanian, Daniel A. Third Parties in Presidential Elections. New York FranklinWatts, 1974.Murr, Andrew. "Superhero". Newsweek (Special Election Issue) November/December,1992. pp.70-77.Robinson, James W., ed. Ross Perot Speaks Out. Rocklin Prima Publishing, 1992..